From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200301061401.h06E1E118542@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: diff format (was: Re: your mail)
In-Reply-To: <3E196182.AC93EFB3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at
 Jan 6, 2003 10:59:14 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:01:14 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Richard Dawe:
> ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> > Please, put a sensible subject on your mails.

Hrmm, and I forgot to better it...

> > Here. We prefer patches made with "diff -pruN" or "diff -prN", if I'm
> > not mistaken.
> 
> I seem to remember Eli expressing a preference for context diffs (-prcN) a
> while back. But no-one seemed to object, when I mistakenly posted unified
> diffs. ;)

Sorry, I thought diff defaulted to context diffs.


Right,

						MartinS