Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2018/08/05/08:24:35
On 08/04/2018 10:11 PM, Rugxulo (rugxulo AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Andris Pavenis
> (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]
> <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> DJGPP packages of gcc-8.2.0 together with cross-compiler RPM packages (built
>> in CentOS 6 chroot, should work on later RPM based distributions like
>> Fedora) are available for testing from
>>
>> http://ap1.pp.fi/djgpp/gcc/gcc-version-index.html
>>
>> I upload packages to ftp.delorie.com sometimes later.
> Seems they're already available (but no announcement yet). You never
> wait long (not that I blame you)! I didn't test much, only one C
> program (so far), but it seems to still work okay (with latest
> BinUtils). BTW ....
Sent now and will apear when DJ approves.
>
> GCC 8.2.0's gcc.info (erroneously) says:
>
> The default, if no C language dialect options are given, is
> `-std=gnu11'.
>
> But later says this (correctly):
>
> `gnu17'
> `gnu18'
> GNU dialect of ISO C17. This is the default for C code.
>
> DJGPP's GCC 8.2.0 (default) = gnu17 = 201710L
>
> Of course, a quick grep does show mention of "201710L" in cpp.info, so
> perhaps I should've known it'd be mentioned somewhere. (I don't follow
> standards that closely, apparently this is just correcting defects.
> Even "-std=c11" now is supposedly 100% identical in "corrected"
> functionality. So this is only a cosmetic change.)
>
Source for INFO files is not modified for DJGPP port in any way.
Andris
- Raw text -