X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: gcc-8.2.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <248415bb-553f-6dfa-6d72-7e736cdfa127 AT iki DOT fi> From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <3513a9b6-08b7-9c7d-399b-1180a9a67ced@iki.fi> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 15:24:21 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US-large Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 08/04/2018 10:11 PM, Rugxulo (rugxulo AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Andris Pavenis > (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com] > wrote: >> DJGPP packages of gcc-8.2.0 together with cross-compiler RPM packages (built >> in CentOS 6 chroot, should work on later RPM based distributions like >> Fedora) are available for testing from >> >> http://ap1.pp.fi/djgpp/gcc/gcc-version-index.html >> >> I upload packages to ftp.delorie.com sometimes later. > Seems they're already available (but no announcement yet). You never > wait long (not that I blame you)! I didn't test much, only one C > program (so far), but it seems to still work okay (with latest > BinUtils). BTW .... Sent now and will apear when DJ approves. > > GCC 8.2.0's gcc.info (erroneously) says: > > The default, if no C language dialect options are given, is > `-std=gnu11'. > > But later says this (correctly): > > `gnu17' > `gnu18' > GNU dialect of ISO C17. This is the default for C code. > > DJGPP's GCC 8.2.0 (default) = gnu17 = 201710L > > Of course, a quick grep does show mention of "201710L" in cpp.info, so > perhaps I should've known it'd be mentioned somewhere. (I don't follow > standards that closely, apparently this is just correcting defects. > Even "-std=c11" now is supposedly 100% identical in "corrected" > functionality. So this is only a cosmetic change.) > Source for INFO files is not modified for DJGPP port in any way. Andris