Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/11/17/10:53:42
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> According to cvs-peuha AT delorie DOT com:
> > RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/libc/go32/overflow.S,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1
> > diff -p -2 /dev/null -r1.1
> > *** /dev/null 2003-01-30 05:24:37.000000000 -0500
> > --- djgpp/src/libc/go32/overflow.S 2003-11-07 04:52:51.000000000 -0500 1.1
> > ***************
> > *** 0 ****
> > --- 1,61 ----
> > + .file "overflow.S"
> > + .data
> > + .balign 8
> ...
> > + .balign 16,,7
> > + .globl ___djgpp_stack_overflow_exit
> > + ___djgpp_stack_overflow_exit:
>
> I see that Esa put in some header stuff that my fpclass*.S files are
> missing.
>
> Should I add this to my files? At least that .balign 16,,7 (or some
> alignment) sounds like a good idea. But why 16,,7? Shouldn't we use 8
> or 16?
>
> Which alignment do we really want?
Well, I copied those lines from gcc-generated assembler files. If
there's something wrong with the alignment, then pretty much anything
compiled with gcc 2.95 (and maybe other versions) has the same problem.
--
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/
- Raw text -