X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:08:07 +0200 (EET) From: Esa A E Peuha Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi To: DJGPP-WORKERS Subject: Re: .S headers (was: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/libc/go32/makefile,overflow.S) In-Reply-To: <200311161921.hAGJLDFh009438@speedy.ludd.luth.se> Message-ID: References: <200311161921 DOT hAGJLDFh009438 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote: > According to cvs-peuha AT delorie DOT com: > > RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/libc/go32/overflow.S,v > > retrieving revision 1.1 > > diff -p -2 /dev/null -r1.1 > > *** /dev/null 2003-01-30 05:24:37.000000000 -0500 > > --- djgpp/src/libc/go32/overflow.S 2003-11-07 04:52:51.000000000 -0500 1.1 > > *************** > > *** 0 **** > > --- 1,61 ---- > > + .file "overflow.S" > > + .data > > + .balign 8 > ... > > + .balign 16,,7 > > + .globl ___djgpp_stack_overflow_exit > > + ___djgpp_stack_overflow_exit: > > I see that Esa put in some header stuff that my fpclass*.S files are > missing. > > Should I add this to my files? At least that .balign 16,,7 (or some > alignment) sounds like a good idea. But why 16,,7? Shouldn't we use 8 > or 16? > > Which alignment do we really want? Well, I copied those lines from gcc-generated assembler files. If there's something wrong with the alignment, then pretty much anything compiled with gcc 2.95 (and maybe other versions) has the same problem. -- Esa Peuha student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/