Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/11/10/15:40:30
Hello.
Esa A E Peuha wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
>
> > Could you put some text at the start of this file, explaining what
> > its purpose is, please?
>
> Would it be enough to describe this in overflow.txh instead? Something
> like this:
Yes, that looks good. I have some small suggestions. See below.
> @c ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> @node Stack overflow handler, signal
> @vindex __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip
> @findex __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit
> @subheading Syntax
>
> @example
> unsigned int __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip;
I think you need an "extern":
extern unsigned int __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip;
> void __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit(void);
> @end example
>
> @subheading Description
>
> This is the stack overflow handler, intended to be used only by
> compiler-generated code.
How about this?
"This is the stack overflow handler, an internal function intended to be used
only by special code generated by the compiler."
> This will exit with suitable error message.
[snip]
"suitable error message" -> "a suitable error message"?
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi,v
> retrieving revision 1.162
> diff -c -r1.162 wc204.txi
> *** wc204.txi 8 Nov 2003 12:19:40 -0000 1.162
> --- wc204.txi 10 Nov 2003 11:52:10 -0000
> ***************
> *** 1032,1034 ****
> --- 1032,1038 ----
> @code{strftime} now uses the date format (for @code{%x})
> and time format (for @code{%X}) from the current locale.
> This means that @code{%T} and @code{%X} are no longer equivalent.
> +
> + @vindex __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip AT r{ added}
> + @findex __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit AT r{ added}
> + The stack overflow handler was added.
"The" -> "A"?
Thanks, bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone." -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek
- Raw text -