Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/11/10/06:56:28
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
> Could you put some text at the start of this file, explaining what its purpose
> is, please?
Would it be enough to describe this in overflow.txh instead? Something
like this:
@c ----------------------------------------------------------------------
@node Stack overflow handler, signal
@vindex __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip
@findex __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit
@subheading Syntax
@example
unsigned int __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip;
void __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit(void);
@end example
@subheading Description
This is the stack overflow handler, intended to be used only by
compiler-generated code. This will exit with suitable error message.
@subheading Return Value
This function does not return.
@subheading Portability
@portability !ansi, !posix
> Perhaps we need an entry in "What's Changed" too. Perhaps we don't, since gcc
> doesn't use this functionality yet. I'm not sure. Esa, what do you think?
I think we should document what we have, whether it's used or not.
Index: wc204.txi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi,v
retrieving revision 1.162
diff -c -r1.162 wc204.txi
*** wc204.txi 8 Nov 2003 12:19:40 -0000 1.162
--- wc204.txi 10 Nov 2003 11:52:10 -0000
***************
*** 1032,1034 ****
--- 1032,1038 ----
@code{strftime} now uses the date format (for @code{%x})
and time format (for @code{%X}) from the current locale.
This means that @code{%T} and @code{%X} are no longer equivalent.
+
+ @vindex __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip AT r{ added}
+ @findex __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit AT r{ added}
+ The stack overflow handler was added.
--
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/
- Raw text -