X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:55:08 +0200 (EET) From: Esa A E Peuha Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi To: DJGPP workers Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/libc/go32/makefile,overflow.S In-Reply-To: <3FACDD1E.4950D38B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <200311070952 DOT hA79qp0D028636 AT delorie DOT com> <3FACDD1E DOT 4950D38B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Richard Dawe wrote: > Could you put some text at the start of this file, explaining what its purpose > is, please? Would it be enough to describe this in overflow.txh instead? Something like this: @c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- @node Stack overflow handler, signal @vindex __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip @findex __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit @subheading Syntax @example unsigned int __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip; void __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit(void); @end example @subheading Description This is the stack overflow handler, intended to be used only by compiler-generated code. This will exit with suitable error message. @subheading Return Value This function does not return. @subheading Portability @portability !ansi, !posix > Perhaps we need an entry in "What's Changed" too. Perhaps we don't, since gcc > doesn't use this functionality yet. I'm not sure. Esa, what do you think? I think we should document what we have, whether it's used or not. Index: wc204.txi =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi,v retrieving revision 1.162 diff -c -r1.162 wc204.txi *** wc204.txi 8 Nov 2003 12:19:40 -0000 1.162 --- wc204.txi 10 Nov 2003 11:52:10 -0000 *************** *** 1032,1034 **** --- 1032,1038 ---- @code{strftime} now uses the date format (for @code{%x}) and time format (for @code{%X}) from the current locale. This means that @code{%T} and @code{%X} are no longer equivalent. + + @vindex __djgpp_stack_overflow_eip AT r{ added} + @findex __djgpp_stack_overflow_exit AT r{ added} + The stack overflow handler was added. -- Esa Peuha student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/