X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	28 Oct 2003 19:26:07 +0200
Message-Id:	<uvfq9clzk.fsf@elta.co.il>
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Kbwms AT aol DOT com
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<182.22490ddc.2ccfdd07@aol.com> (Kbwms@aol.com)
Subject:	Re: C99 Functions Under Development and Checkout
References:	<182 DOT 22490ddc DOT 2ccfdd07 AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:53:59 EST
> 
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/toc.htm
> 
> contain the following text:
> 
>      On error, the expressions (math_errhandling & MATH_ERRNO) and
>      (math_errhandling & MATH_ERREXCEPT) are independent of each
>      other, but at least one of them must be non-zero.
> 
> At the moment, every function assumes that both expressions are non-zero
> because neither 'math-errhandling' nor 'MATH_ERREXCEPT' is defined.
> 
> My intention is to implement the aforementioned variables and modify all
> existing code to check those expressions.  At the beginning, both expressions will
> be non-zero.
> 
> Appended to this email as a postscript are specifications taken from math.h
> at the linkage given above.
> 
> 
> Is this the desired behavior?

Yes, I think so.

- Raw text -