X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: 28 Oct 2003 19:26:07 +0200
Message-Id: <uvfq9clzk.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <182.22490ddc.2ccfdd07@aol.com> (Kbwms@aol.com)
Subject: Re: C99 Functions Under Development and Checkout
References:  <182 DOT 22490ddc DOT 2ccfdd07 AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:53:59 EST
> 
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/toc.htm
> 
> contain the following text:
> 
>      On error, the expressions (math_errhandling & MATH_ERRNO) and
>      (math_errhandling & MATH_ERREXCEPT) are independent of each
>      other, but at least one of them must be non-zero.
> 
> At the moment, every function assumes that both expressions are non-zero
> because neither 'math-errhandling' nor 'MATH_ERREXCEPT' is defined.
> 
> My intention is to implement the aforementioned variables and modify all
> existing code to check those expressions.  At the beginning, both expressions will
> be non-zero.
> 
> Appended to this email as a postscript are specifications taken from math.h
> at the linkage given above.
> 
> 
> Is this the desired behavior?

Yes, I think so.