Date:	Mon, 01 Sep 2003 08:12:11 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id:	<3405-Mon01Sep2003081210+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3F525684.31C917FE@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:11:48 +0100)
Subject:	Re: /dev/c - c: or c:/ ?
References:	<3F525684 DOT 31C917FE AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:11:48 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Should /dev/c expand to c: or c:/ with run through _fixpath? Since /dev/c
> looks like an absolute path, I think it should expand to c:/ . Currently it
> doesn't. Note that /dev/c/. expands to c:/ .
> 
> I'm wondering if there's some reason that it expands to c: .

What other way is there to express "c:" with the /dev/x notation?

Does the current expansion hurt anything?  If so, what?

- Raw text -