Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 08:12:11 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: Richard Dawe Message-Id: <3405-Mon01Sep2003081210+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3F525684.31C917FE@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard Dawe on Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:11:48 +0100) Subject: Re: /dev/c - c: or c:/ ? References: <3F525684 DOT 31C917FE AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:11:48 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe > > Should /dev/c expand to c: or c:/ with run through _fixpath? Since /dev/c > looks like an absolute path, I think it should expand to c:/ . Currently it > doesn't. Note that /dev/c/. expands to c:/ . > > I'm wondering if there's some reason that it expands to c: . What other way is there to express "c:" with the /dev/x notation? Does the current expansion hurt anything? If so, what?