Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E76F355.583E634B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:22:13 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: strto{d,f,ld}, inf and nan patch
References:	<200303161536 DOT QAA01921 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <3E75A26E DOT 18FCF9E5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <6137-Tue18Mar2003092204+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
[snip]
> Btw, what does C9x say about <anything> that specifies a bit pattern
> which is not a NaN?

Footnote 250 says: "An implementation may use the n-char sequence to determine
extra information to be represented in the NaN?s significand."

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -