Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3E76F355.583E634B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:22:13 +0000 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: strto{d,f,ld}, inf and nan patch References: <200303161536 DOT QAA01921 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <3E75A26E DOT 18FCF9E5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <6137-Tue18Mar2003092204+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Eli Zaretskii wrote: [snip] > Btw, what does C9x say about that specifies a bit pattern > which is not a NaN? Footnote 250 says: "An implementation may use the n-char sequence to determine extra information to be represented in the NaN?s significand." Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]