Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E5D042C.10179331@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:15:08 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: fchmod, revision 3 [PATCH]
References:	<200302261504 DOT QAA11492 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Martin Stromberg wrote:
[snip]
> Shouldn't you check that that close() is successful? In case of
> buffering or whatever you might not see any error until you close the
> file. (There might be other close()s you need to check as well.)

Yes, I've added three checks to the test program: two for close and one for
_dos_close. I also fixed the return-value check for _dos_open, which was
slightly wrong (according to the info page) - I was checking for < 0 rather
than != 0.

These changes did not affect the test result under Windows '98 SE or the DOS
that comes with Windows '98 SE.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -