Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E552544.2B300FE8@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:58:12 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: FSEXT hooks for chmod, chown [PATCH]
References:	<E18lpSc-0000aK-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200302201830 DOT h1KIUuw13116 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> >    __FSEXT_llseek,
> >    __FSEXT_readlink,
> >    __FSEXT_symlink,
> > +  __FSEXT_chmod,
> > +  __FSEXT_chown,
> >    __FSEXT_fchown
> >  } __FSEXT_Fnumber;
> 
> Why aren't new entries added at the bottom?  This way, the value of
> __FSEXT_fchown changes.

I didn't really think that mattered right now, since 2.04's still in
development and we haven't released any alphas yet. I thought it would be
better for __FSEXT_chown to occur before __FSEXT_fchown in the list for
asthetic reasons.

I'll put them at the bottom.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -