Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3E552544.2B300FE8@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:58:12 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: FSEXT hooks for chmod, chown [PATCH]
References: <E18lpSc-0000aK-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200302201830 DOT h1KIUuw13116 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> >    __FSEXT_llseek,
> >    __FSEXT_readlink,
> >    __FSEXT_symlink,
> > +  __FSEXT_chmod,
> > +  __FSEXT_chown,
> >    __FSEXT_fchown
> >  } __FSEXT_Fnumber;
> 
> Why aren't new entries added at the bottom?  This way, the value of
> __FSEXT_fchown changes.

I didn't really think that mattered right now, since 2.04's still in
development and we haven't released any alphas yet. I thought it would be
better for __FSEXT_chown to occur before __FSEXT_fchown in the list for
asthetic reasons.

I'll put them at the bottom.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]