delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sat, 08 Feb 2003 11:45:09 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <1659-Sat08Feb2003114509+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
In-reply-to: | <3E43F543.EC75DCB8@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard |
Dawe on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:04:51 +0000) | |
Subject: | Re: FSEXT hooks and symlinks |
References: | <3D048EF2 DOT 455CD32B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <161256143054 DOT 20020626173357 AT softhome DOT net> <3E43F543 DOT EC75DCB8 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:04:51 +0000 > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > I think the __FSEXT_call_open_handlers_wrapper call should be after the > __solve_dir_symlinks call. Is it OK to change them around? Fine with me. Thanks for catching this.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |