Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 11:45:09 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <1659-Sat08Feb2003114509+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3E43F543.EC75DCB8@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:04:51 +0000)
Subject: Re: FSEXT hooks and symlinks
References: <3D048EF2 DOT 455CD32B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <161256143054 DOT 20020626173357 AT softhome DOT net> <3E43F543 DOT EC75DCB8 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:04:51 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I think the __FSEXT_call_open_handlers_wrapper call should be after the
> __solve_dir_symlinks call. Is it OK to change them around?

Fine with me.  Thanks for catching this.