delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 2003 23:50:33 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <5567-Thu30Jan2003235033+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
In-reply-to: | <E18eLjJ-0000oQ-00@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> |
(rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk) | |
Subject: | Re: __internal_readlink & findfirst: attributes? [PATCH] |
References: | <E18eLjJ-0000oQ-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:58:04 +0000 > From: "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > Currently we call findfirst from __internal_readlink with the attributes > set to 0. I think we should pass in some combination of the FA_* bits. > The patch below passes in FA_RDONLY|FA_ARCH. I know these bits > are ignored by the INT 21h subfunction that's used by findfirst, > but I think we should pass them in, because: > > (a) it shows what we mean to do; > (b) it won't break if something does ever support those bits. > > OK to commit? Yes, okay. Thanks.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |