Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 23:50:33 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <5567-Thu30Jan2003235033+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <E18eLjJ-0000oQ-00@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
	(rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk)
Subject: Re: __internal_readlink & findfirst: attributes? [PATCH]
References:  <E18eLjJ-0000oQ-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:58:04 +0000
> From: "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Currently we call findfirst from __internal_readlink with the attributes
> set to 0. I think we should pass in some combination of the FA_* bits.
> The patch below passes in FA_RDONLY|FA_ARCH. I know these bits
> are ignored by the INT 21h subfunction that's used by findfirst,
> but I think we should pass them in, because:
> 
> (a) it shows what we mean to do;
> (b) it won't break if something does ever support those bits.
> 
> OK to commit?

Yes, okay.

Thanks.