Message-ID:	<3E305DAB.8090607@mif.vu.lt>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:24:59 +0100
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <laurynas DOT biveinis AT mif DOT vu DOT lt>
Organization:	VU MIF
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:	lt, en, en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: Take on __solve_symlinks()
References:	<3E286C07 DOT 7040200 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E2943DA DOT 523770FC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E297258 DOT 50906 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E2A9396 DOT EF36FE73 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
In-Reply-To:	<3E2A9396.EF36FE73@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	23 Jan 2003 20:23:06.0049 (UTC) FILETIME=[3CC02B10:01C2C31D]
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
>>No I don't, but I didn't see any failures, probably because we're
>>running two different test programs - I've cleaned up the test program a
>>bit. I'm attaching it. Could you tell if it fails with your testcases?
> 
> 
> Which test cases? The ones I have described or the ones that failed?

The ones you've described.

> The test cases that failed are in the CVS xsymlink test. I haven't added any
> test cases to that for a while. The tests that fail are the ones that take the
> current directory, count the number of slashes (n_slashes) and then prepend
> lots of ".."s to the path without the directory (cwd_without_drive).

Uhm, I guess I have a problem with my setup here - these test cases 
don't fail for me. Maybe you have some piece of advice?

sh-2.05b$ pwd
c:/devel/djgpp/tests/libc/compat/unistd
sh-2.05b$ ./xsymlink
Running __solve_symlinks() and readlink() testsuite:
Tests that check __solve_symlinks() works:
Test 1 passed
Test 2 passed
Test 3 passed
Test 4 passed
Test 5 passed
Test 6 passed
Test 7 passed
Test 8 passed
Test 9 passed
Test 10 passed
Test 11 passed
Test 12 passed
Test 13 passed
Tests that check __solve_symlinks() based on current directory:
Test 1: Solving 
c:/devel/djgpp/tests/libc/compat/unistd/../../../../../../devel/djgpp/tests/libc/compat/unistd/test1
Test 1 passed
Test 2: Solving 
c:../../../../../../devel/djgpp/tests/libc/compat/unistd/test1
Test 2 passed
Test 3: Solving 
c:../../../../../../../devel/djgpp/tests/libc/compat/unistd/test1
Test 3 passed
Tests that check __solve_symlinks() failure cases:
Test 1 passed
Test 2 passed
PASS

>>>* symlinks between drives;
>>
>>Will see, the problem is that not everybody has multiple drives...
> 
> 
> Most computers have a floppy drive, don't they?

So we will require user to insert blank formatted diskette into drive 
A:, won't we? Somehow it does not look reasonable for me :)

--
Laurynas

- Raw text -