Date:	Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:58:30 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: lseek() calling llseek()
In-Reply-To:	<200301192123.h0JLNiI25176@brother.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1030120075803.21625E-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 lnobody AT delorie DOT com wrote:

> --- djgpp/src/libc/fsext/fsext.txh      8 Jul 2002 12:55:42 -0000       1.15
> +++ djgpp/src/libc/fsext/fsext.txh      19 Jan 2003 21:18:24 -0000
> @@ -98,7 +98,10 @@ A file ioctl handler (@pxref{ioctl (Gene
>  
>  @item __FSEXT_lseek
>  
> -A file lseek handler (@pxref{lseek}).
> +A file lseek handler (@pxref{lseek}).  Here for backwards
> +compatibility.  Use @code{__FSEXT_llseek} instead.  If you have a
> +@code{__FSEXT_llseek} handler you don't need a @code{__FSEXT_lseek}
> +handler as @code{lseek} calls @code{llseek} internally.

This is fine with me.

- Raw text -