Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:58:30 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: lseek() calling llseek()
In-Reply-To: <200301192123.h0JLNiI25176@brother.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1030120075803.21625E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 lnobody AT delorie DOT com wrote:

> --- djgpp/src/libc/fsext/fsext.txh      8 Jul 2002 12:55:42 -0000       1.15
> +++ djgpp/src/libc/fsext/fsext.txh      19 Jan 2003 21:18:24 -0000
> @@ -98,7 +98,10 @@ A file ioctl handler (@pxref{ioctl (Gene
>  
>  @item __FSEXT_lseek
>  
> -A file lseek handler (@pxref{lseek}).
> +A file lseek handler (@pxref{lseek}).  Here for backwards
> +compatibility.  Use @code{__FSEXT_llseek} instead.  If you have a
> +@code{__FSEXT_llseek} handler you don't need a @code{__FSEXT_lseek}
> +handler as @code{lseek} calls @code{llseek} internally.

This is fine with me.