| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:14:40 +0300 |
| From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Message-Id: | <3791-Thu16Jan2003181439+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
| X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
| In-reply-to: | <3E26CD19.62B2EC11@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard |
| Dawe on Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:17:45 +0000) | |
| Subject: | Re: Opportunity for using common code: getcwd() |
| References: | <3E26CD19 DOT 62B2EC11 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:17:45 +0000 > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > While trying to fix some bugs in __solve_symlink, I noticed that the code for > _fixpath and getcwd has similar sections for obtaining the current directory > on a given drive. Why don't they use the same code? Probably, just history.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |