Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:14:40 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <3791-Thu16Jan2003181439+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3E26CD19.62B2EC11@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:17:45 +0000)
Subject: Re: Opportunity for using common code: getcwd()
References:  <3E26CD19 DOT 62B2EC11 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:17:45 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> While trying to fix some bugs in __solve_symlink, I noticed that the code for
> _fixpath and getcwd has similar sections for obtaining the current directory
> on a given drive. Why don't they use the same code?

Probably, just history.