Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:14:37 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<1438-Fri10Jan2003221436+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to:	<3E1D3A04.ACF0CFE1@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:59:48 +0000)
Subject:	Re: RESEND: strlcat, strlcpy [PATCH]
References:	<F9cwAQq12LRF58tP9DL000250b7 AT hotmail DOT com> <3E1D3A04 DOT ACF0CFE1 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:59:48 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I always find it hard to work out what's going on with for loops that do
> character-by-character copies. That's why I wrote the implementation I
> proposed using memcpy, etc.

memcpy is faster for long strings.

- Raw text -