Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:14:37 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <1438-Fri10Jan2003221436+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3E1D3A04.ACF0CFE1@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:59:48 +0000)
Subject: Re: RESEND: strlcat, strlcpy [PATCH]
References: <F9cwAQq12LRF58tP9DL000250b7 AT hotmail DOT com> <3E1D3A04 DOT ACF0CFE1 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:59:48 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> I always find it hard to work out what's going on with for loops that do
> character-by-character copies. That's why I wrote the implementation I
> proposed using memcpy, etc.

memcpy is faster for long strings.