delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200301061401.h06E1E118542@speedy.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | diff format (was: Re: your mail) |
In-Reply-To: | <3E196182.AC93EFB3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at |
Jan 6, 2003 10:59:14 am" | |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:01:14 +0100 (CET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-MailScanner: | Found to be clean |
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: | s |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Richard Dawe: > ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote: > > Please, put a sensible subject on your mails. Hrmm, and I forgot to better it... > > Here. We prefer patches made with "diff -pruN" or "diff -prN", if I'm > > not mistaken. > > I seem to remember Eli expressing a preference for context diffs (-prcN) a > while back. But no-one seemed to object, when I mistakenly posted unified > diffs. ;) Sorry, I thought diff defaulted to context diffs. Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |