Date:	Thu, 4 May 2000 18:07:17 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
cc:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Subject:	Re: minor DJGPP config change
In-Reply-To:	<00050415203200.23536@hal>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000504180442.19648B@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 4 May 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> Really it was so: gcc-2.96 didn't found $DJDIR/lib as gcc tried to use relative
> prefix.

Could you please explain this a bit more in detail?  I'm not sure I 
understand: are you telling that there was a bug in GCC 2.96 which caused 
it to think $DJDIR/lib was a relative path name?  If so, is that 
corrected in current development sources?

- Raw text -