Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:07:17 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
cc: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Subject: Re: minor DJGPP config change
In-Reply-To: <00050415203200.23536@hal>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000504180442.19648B@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 4 May 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> Really it was so: gcc-2.96 didn't found $DJDIR/lib as gcc tried to use relative
> prefix.

Could you please explain this a bit more in detail?  I'm not sure I 
understand: are you telling that there was a bug in GCC 2.96 which caused 
it to think $DJDIR/lib was a relative path name?  If so, is that 
corrected in current development sources?