delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
To: | "DJGPP List (E-mail)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
From: | "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | About different programming language support for DJGPP port of GCC |
Message-ID: | <761aff8d-eb27-fcae-5486-28fdf878d2fd@iki.fi> |
Date: | Sat, 30 Jul 2016 14:09:22 +0300 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Thunderbird/45.1.1 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Sent patches for DJGPP support to GCC Ada compiler: 1/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02005.html 2/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02006.html 3/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02007.html 4/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02008.html Got an answer https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02009.html, which raises correct question: how many people are actually using DJGPP port of Ada compiler? I myself do not belong to that list. Only testing whether some package builds with newest version of port also perhaps do not qualify. Building port of Ada compiler as part of GCC build does not qualifies either. Actually using DJGPP port of Ada compiler for some other project qualifies. I guess one should tell on list if he/she is actually using it for something real. Perhaps one should also ask the same question also about ports of Fortran, Objective-C and Objective-C++ compilers. Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |