X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
To: "DJGPP List (E-mail)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: About different programming language support for DJGPP port of GCC
Message-ID: <761aff8d-eb27-fcae-5486-28fdf878d2fd@iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 14:09:22 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Sent patches for DJGPP support to GCC Ada compiler:

1/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02005.html

2/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02006.html

3/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02007.html

4/4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02008.html


Got an answer https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02009.html, which raises correct 
question: how many people are actually using DJGPP port of Ada compiler?

I myself do not belong to that list. Only testing whether some package builds with newest version 
of port also perhaps do not qualify. Building port of Ada compiler as part of GCC build does not 
qualifies either. Actually using DJGPP port of Ada compiler for some other project qualifies.

I guess one should tell on list if he/she is actually using it for something real.

Perhaps one should also ask the same question also about ports of Fortran, Objective-C and 
Objective-C++ compilers.

Andris