delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
From: | "decker" <bdeck AT lycos DOT co DOT uk> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP Modifications: second try |
Date: | 29 May 2006 20:47:45 -0700 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
Lines: | 21 |
Message-ID: | <1148960865.471041.177110@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> |
References: | <1148891367 DOT 146603 DOT 103410 AT j55g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
<447b9821 DOT 857899 AT news DOT execpc DOT com> | |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 202.3.192.11 |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | posting.google.com 1148960870 17996 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2006 03:47:50 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Tue, 30 May 2006 03:47:50 +0000 (UTC) |
In-Reply-To: | <447b9821.857899@news.execpc.com> |
User-Agent: | G2/0.2 |
X-HTTP-UserAgent: | Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) |
X-HTTP-Via: | 1.0 DDA-SBS1 |
Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
Injection-Info: | i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.3.192.11; |
posting-account=R02xJAwAAAASwE3U1qQ37KcHXmocYA_U | |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Chris Giese wrote: > Does your version of DJGPP use segments with base address = 0? Sorry, it would be too early for specific questions of that nature. Frankly, I am hoping that they are premature :) Just for information, IMHO there could never be a "your version of DJGPP". DJGPP is Delorie J GPP. A FreeDOS OS distribution is being planned, that will hopefully provide DJGPP as a development environment. Whether that environment ends up separate fork from what is released here(i.e. Ubuntu vs. Debian, for lack of better example) depends on the response we get. Then it would be built on DJGPP, but it wouldn't be DJGPP. But I think the user base as a whole would appreciate a less confusing variety of development environments. Regards, Ben Decker www.caddit.net
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |