X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: "decker" <bdeck AT lycos DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP Modifications: second try
Date: 29 May 2006 20:47:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1148960865.471041.177110@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
References: <1148891367 DOT 146603 DOT 103410 AT j55g2000cwa DOT googlegroups DOT com>
   <447b9821 DOT 857899 AT news DOT execpc DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.3.192.11
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1148960870 17996 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2006 03:47:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 03:47:50 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <447b9821.857899@news.execpc.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 DDA-SBS1
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.3.192.11;
   posting-account=R02xJAwAAAASwE3U1qQ37KcHXmocYA_U
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Chris Giese wrote:
> Does your version of DJGPP use segments with base address = 0?

Sorry, it would be too early for specific questions of that nature.
Frankly, I am hoping that they are premature :)

Just for information, IMHO there could never be a "your version of
DJGPP". DJGPP is Delorie J GPP. A FreeDOS OS distribution is being
planned, that will hopefully provide DJGPP as a development
environment. Whether that environment ends up separate fork from what
is released here(i.e. Ubuntu vs. Debian, for lack of better example)
depends on the response we get. Then it would be built on DJGPP, but it
wouldn't be DJGPP.

But I think the user base as a whole would appreciate a less confusing
variety of development environments.

Regards,
Ben Decker
www.caddit.net