Message-ID:	<3DCFA674.75F27721@lml.ls.fi.upm.es>
Date:	Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:45:40 +0100
From:	Manuel Collado <m DOT collado AT aaron DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Is gcc-3.2 an official versions
References:	<CAC03AD3B71FD41195CC00508B6A7EAB02ACAAE5 AT TOR8>
	<200211051346 DOT gA5Dkx817350 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3DCB844F DOT AA31311D AT lml DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es> <200211081426 DOT gA8EQP329314 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	138.100.10.20
X-Trace:	11 Nov 2002 13:45:47 +0100, 138.100.10.20
Lines:	27
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:
> [snip]
> > sh-utils-2.01       2.0.11
> 
> The zip file identifies itself as 2.01 when you unzip it, so I'll
> leave this the same until the zip is changed.

When I unzip shl2011b.zip, I find:

- manifest/shl2011b.ver:
Sh-utils 2.0.11 Apr 18, 2002 - Prashant TR <tr AT midpec DOT com>

- manifest/shl2001b.dsm:
...
dsm-author: Prashant TR
dsm-author-email: tr AT midpec DOT com

name: sh-utils
version: 2.0.11
...

Are we talking about the same zip file?

Regards,
-- 
To reply by e-mail, please remove the extra dot
in the given address:  m.collado -> mcollado

- Raw text -