Message-ID: <3DCFA674.75F27721@lml.ls.fi.upm.es> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:45:40 +0100 From: Manuel Collado X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Is gcc-3.2 an official versions References: <200211051346 DOT gA5Dkx817350 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3DCB844F DOT AA31311D AT lml DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es> <200211081426 DOT gA8EQP329314 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.100.10.20 X-Trace: 11 Nov 2002 13:45:47 +0100, 138.100.10.20 Lines: 27 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ Delorie wrote: > [snip] > > sh-utils-2.01 2.0.11 > > The zip file identifies itself as 2.01 when you unzip it, so I'll > leave this the same until the zip is changed. When I unzip shl2011b.zip, I find: - manifest/shl2011b.ver: Sh-utils 2.0.11 Apr 18, 2002 - Prashant TR - manifest/shl2001b.dsm: ... dsm-author: Prashant TR dsm-author-email: tr AT midpec DOT com name: sh-utils version: 2.0.11 ... Are we talking about the same zip file? Regards, -- To reply by e-mail, please remove the extra dot in the given address: m.collado -> mcollado