| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:04:48 -0400 |
| Message-Id: | <200206251404.g5PE4m432550@envy.delorie.com> |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | pavenis AT lanet DOT lv |
| CC: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <3D184DB9.20778.1A608F@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv) |
| Subject: | Re: -nostdinc and sys/version.h |
| References: | <3d17dc6e$0$1424$272ea4a1 AT news DOT execpc DOT com> (NoEmailAds AT execpc DOT com) <3D184DB9 DOT 20778 DOT 1A608F AT localhost> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> The question is whether we need that DJGPP doesn't *need* that. That code is no different than hard-coding -D's in gcc, it's part of "being djgpp". But, it would be nice if at least -nostdinc didn't cause errors because of it.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |