Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:04:48 -0400
Message-Id: <200206251404.g5PE4m432550@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3D184DB9.20778.1A608F@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: -nostdinc and sys/version.h
References: <3d17dc6e$0$1424$272ea4a1 AT news DOT execpc DOT com>	(NoEmailAds AT execpc DOT com) <3D184DB9 DOT 20778 DOT 1A608F AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> The question is whether we need that

DJGPP doesn't *need* that.  That code is no different than hard-coding
-D's in gcc, it's part of "being djgpp".  But, it would be nice if at
least -nostdinc didn't cause errors because of it.