Sender:	tim AT mxrelay DOT g-net DOT be
Message-ID:	<3BA60F95.6DD944D3@falconsoft.be>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:58:29 +0200
From:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
Organization:	Anubex (www.anubex.com)
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	en, nl-BE, nl
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Benjamin 'Killer' Kalytta" <bkausbk AT web DOT de>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: function overload in gcc
References:	<9o0hbg$98u$06$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <9o27fm$sk2$00$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <1000646864 DOT 676853 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <9o3qgt$5tn$04$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <3BA570B9 DOT EB526045 AT earthlink DOT net> <9o4uu3$s8c$04$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Benjamin 'Killer' Kalytta wrote:
> 
> I tried C++ compiler gpp yesterday ... but the problem is, that this
> compiler will generate a load of overhead which I don't need.

Most, if not all, of that is due to exception handling support.
If you don't need it, you can use the -fno-exceptions flag to turn it
off.  GCC 3.0.1 seems to be smart enough to do this by itself.

- Raw text -