Sender: tim AT mxrelay DOT g-net DOT be
Message-ID: <3BA60F95.6DD944D3@falconsoft.be>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:58:29 +0200
From: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
Organization: Anubex (www.anubex.com)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en, nl-BE, nl
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Benjamin 'Killer' Kalytta" <bkausbk AT web DOT de>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: function overload in gcc
References: <9o0hbg$98u$06$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <9o27fm$sk2$00$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <1000646864 DOT 676853 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <9o3qgt$5tn$04$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <3BA570B9 DOT EB526045 AT earthlink DOT net> <9o4uu3$s8c$04$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Benjamin 'Killer' Kalytta wrote:
> 
> I tried C++ compiler gpp yesterday ... but the problem is, that this
> compiler will generate a load of overhead which I don't need.

Most, if not all, of that is due to exception handling support.
If you don't need it, you can use the -fno-exceptions flag to turn it
off.  GCC 3.0.1 seems to be smart enough to do this by itself.