Message-ID:	<3B0B0D93.2D3EA5D3@optonline.net>
From:	Matthew Krause <krause AT optonline DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP is based on ...
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010510122204 DOT 4017C-100000 AT is>
Lines:	27
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2001 01:09:18 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.191.42.182
X-Trace:	news02.optonline.net 990580158 24.191.42.182 (Tue, 22 May 2001 21:09:18 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 22 May 2001 21:09:18 EDT
Organization:	Optimum Online
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
>
> > > Curiously enough, DJGPP is not listed neither among the primary
> > > platforms, not among the secondary ones.  Perhaps someone should tell
> > > the GCC maintainers that we exist ;-)
> >
> > Confusion - most probably you are referring to primary or secondary
> > platforms for testing upcoming 3.0.
>
> The language of the Web pages is confusing: it is easy to understand
> that those are the platforms supported by GCC 3.0.  I did guess they
> meant testing, but the wording doesn't make it clear:

I just (5/22) noticed that the page's language has been changed to make it
more clear. It now says "{Primary, Secondary} Evaluation Platforms", along
with a blurb to the effect that this is just a smattering of platforms for
which gcc is avaliable.

FWIW.
~Matt Krause

44100 sec. of Latin class left! Forever!

- Raw text -