Message-ID: <3B0B0D93.2D3EA5D3@optonline.net> From: Matthew Krause X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: DJGPP is based on ... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 01:09:18 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.191.42.182 X-Trace: news02.optonline.net 990580158 24.191.42.182 (Tue, 22 May 2001 21:09:18 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:09:18 EDT Organization: Optimum Online To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2001, Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > > > > Curiously enough, DJGPP is not listed neither among the primary > > > platforms, not among the secondary ones. Perhaps someone should tell > > > the GCC maintainers that we exist ;-) > > > > Confusion - most probably you are referring to primary or secondary > > platforms for testing upcoming 3.0. > > The language of the Web pages is confusing: it is easy to understand > that those are the platforms supported by GCC 3.0. I did guess they > meant testing, but the wording doesn't make it clear: I just (5/22) noticed that the page's language has been changed to make it more clear. It now says "{Primary, Secondary} Evaluation Platforms", along with a blurb to the effect that this is just a smattering of platforms for which gcc is avaliable. FWIW. ~Matt Krause 44100 sec. of Latin class left! Forever!