Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:29:26 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"S. Emami" <savanna AT tpg DOT com DOT au>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler
In-Reply-To:	<3aed4b14@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010430162815.17947A-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, S. Emami wrote:

> Its all about how much of an unused library is included in your executable.

This isn't true: almost everything in the executable is used.  For a 
trivial program, the bulk of the size is the startup code, without which 
a program cannot start.

- Raw text -