Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:29:26 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "S. Emami" <savanna AT tpg DOT com DOT au>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler
In-Reply-To: <3aed4b14@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010430162815.17947A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, S. Emami wrote:

> Its all about how much of an unused library is included in your executable.

This isn't true: almost everything in the executable is used.  For a 
trivial program, the bulk of the size is the startup code, without which 
a program cannot start.