| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Originating-IP: | [24.232.1.206] |
| From: | "Norberto Alfredo Bensa" <ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com> |
| To: | <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
| References: | <9chviu$1ps$1 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl> <9ci3t3$g6o$1 AT node17 DOT cwnet DOT frontiernet DOT net> |
| Subject: | Re: Assembler smal question |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:13:50 -0300 |
| Organization: | nBens@ Computers |
| X-Priority: | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 |
| Message-ID: | <OE62GHEW1Q5kAkVDdsv0000143f@hotmail.com> |
| X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 30 Apr 2001 01:16:56.0619 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F7E27B0:01C0D113] |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 19:18 Subject: Re: Assembler smal question > Second thing is that GCC doesn't support native for x86 CPU assembly > language syntax but instead it supports AT&T syntax wich is more complicated It does, if you use binutils 2.10 or later... or am I missing something? Best regards, Norberto
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |