X-Originating-IP: [24.232.1.206] From: "Norberto Alfredo Bensa" To: References: <9chviu$1ps$1 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl> <9ci3t3$g6o$1 AT node17 DOT cwnet DOT frontiernet DOT net> Subject: Re: Assembler smal question Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:13:50 -0300 Organization: nBens@ Computers X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2001 01:16:56.0619 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F7E27B0:01C0D113] Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexei A. Frounze" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp To: Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 19:18 Subject: Re: Assembler smal question > Second thing is that GCC doesn't support native for x86 CPU assembly > language syntax but instead it supports AT&T syntax wich is more complicated It does, if you use binutils 2.10 or later... or am I missing something? Best regards, Norberto