From:	ahelm AT gmx DOT net
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2001 14:25:29 +0200 (MEST)
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GCC 2.95.3 and C standard(s) + commandline switch problems
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010409150902 DOT 4444A-100000 AT is>
Message-ID:	<26009.986819129@www12.gmx.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Authenticated-Sender:	#0003579562 AT gmx DOT net
X-Mailer:	WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Authenticated-IP:	[194.201.128.4]
X-Flags:	0001
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi Eli,
 
> Does the GCC docs says anywhere that version 2.95.3 supports C9x?  AFAIK, 
> it doesn't.  If I'm right, you will have to wait until GCC v3.0 is 
> released (or some later version, if 3.0 won't support C9x).

"info gcc" says so. (It didn't for 2.95.2)
 
> As for the documented options, I suggest to post your report to the GCC 
> bug-reporting address ("gcc --help" should print that address).  Perhaps 
> the whole issue should have been reported there as well.

Hmmm. I'm not so sure that this is actually a GCC problem and
not a DJGPP port problem. AFAIK the method of passing switches
from gcc to cc1 et. al. is different in DJGPP than UNIX?

Unfortunately all the UNIX systems I currently have acces to
run 2.95.2 or older and I don't have time now to recompile it.
(Don't suggest binariesas, 1) I usually don't trust binaries at all
and 2) I don't have root access to these machines)

> (Personally, I think the GCC manual is in dire need of work, especially 
> as far as command-line options are considered.)

Welcome to the club ;-) 

Regards,

Tony

-- 
__________________________
Anton Helm
Farnborough, Hampshire, UK
mailto:ahelm AT gmx DOT net
phoneto:+44-1252-867200

Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net

- Raw text -