From: ahelm AT gmx DOT net Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 14:25:29 +0200 (MEST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.3 and C standard(s) + commandline switch problems References: Message-ID: <26009.986819129@www12.gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Authenticated-Sender: #0003579562 AT gmx DOT net X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Authenticated-IP: [194.201.128.4] X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi Eli, > Does the GCC docs says anywhere that version 2.95.3 supports C9x? AFAIK, > it doesn't. If I'm right, you will have to wait until GCC v3.0 is > released (or some later version, if 3.0 won't support C9x). "info gcc" says so. (It didn't for 2.95.2) > As for the documented options, I suggest to post your report to the GCC > bug-reporting address ("gcc --help" should print that address). Perhaps > the whole issue should have been reported there as well. Hmmm. I'm not so sure that this is actually a GCC problem and not a DJGPP port problem. AFAIK the method of passing switches from gcc to cc1 et. al. is different in DJGPP than UNIX? Unfortunately all the UNIX systems I currently have acces to run 2.95.2 or older and I don't have time now to recompile it. (Don't suggest binariesas, 1) I usually don't trust binaries at all and 2) I don't have root access to these machines) > (Personally, I think the GCC manual is in dire need of work, especially > as far as command-line options are considered.) Welcome to the club ;-) Regards, Tony -- __________________________ Anton Helm Farnborough, Hampshire, UK mailto:ahelm AT gmx DOT net phoneto:+44-1252-867200 Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net