delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:47:21 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Johan Henriksson <jhe AT realsoftware DOT cjb DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: What does this mean? |
In-Reply-To: | <02a901c09b7c$92b8abc0$6300a8c0@brk> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010221114701.18287L-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Johan Henriksson wrote: > switch(val) > { case 1: return(2); > case 2: return(3); > default: return(5); > } > } > > I'm not sure but I think this is one of the codesnippets that fool's GCC. Did you try this? I don't think GCC will emit a warning for this code. It might print a warning if there's no `default' clause, though.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |